Entry 135: "Nier" Pt.3 End

Dear Internet,

                Well, I am a day late and a Gald short.  I said that I would usually post these reviews on Friday, and here it is Saturday.  I was up late yesterday in an attempt to finish off "Nier" so that I could write a full review.  By the time that I had finished "Nier," it was too late to write a final review.  I think we can all learn something from this experience.  I need to start these reviews earlier so that I can make sure I have enough time.  And you need to remember the definition of "usually."  But I jest, unlike "Nier."

                "Nier" is a game that takes itself too seriously.  From the story to the message that it wants to impart on the player, "Nier" does not know how to lighten up until it absolutely has to.  Everything is taken with the same layer of dark narrative and done so poorly at that.  Take how the game handles the quest to cure Yonah and how it attempts to force the audience to care.  We know as an audience that Nier cares deeply for his daughter.  He is constantly trying to find a way to save her from a death sentence.  That is the whole point of the quest that he sets out on from early on in the game.  However, there is little to no emotional bond that occurs between the character of Yonah and the audience because there is little to no attempt to create that bond.  Early on in the game, there is next to no interaction with her as a character.  We only get a few lines of dialog here and there with a few fetch side quests thrown in.  We are meant to care for her not because we have grown fond of her from a depth of interaction with her but because she is a plot item.  She is there as a reason to go around and explore.  The player does not have to even interact with her at all beyond a few forced dialog bits.  We know she is most likely going to be OK by the end of the game in one way or another since denying this would be one amazing anti-climax.  There is not a real threat of losing her at all, just missing her a little while.  Unlike a game like "Valkyria Chronicles," where having one of your soldiers fall in battle can risk them dying permanently and you will never use them again, "Nier" cannot reproduce this effect by just telling the audience that they are supposed to care about the plot character.  I cared more about the super minor characters in "Valkyria Chronicles" way more than Yonah because there was a real threat of losing the character.  It made me want to protect and keep those characters safe because it would have been my own fault for losing them.

It does not help the fact that the game openly denies interaction with her.

                There is a scene in "Nier" where a certain character permanently changes their physical form significantly, to the point that they look more like a monster than human.  They naturally freak out at such a change, breaking down and crying a little.  Less than two minutes later they say about the transformation, "I was terrified at first, but I think I'm okay with it."  This kind of turnaround of emotion within a short amount of time and with so little force to do so is a reflection of the game's poor story pacing.  The character lost their mortal body but was perfectly alright with it mere minutes later.  The whole transformation felt unneeded to the plot, instead feeling as if the development team had created a character design that they did not want to go to waste.  In fact, Nier himself receives a redesign after a time skip in the game which feels more like forced implementation of unused art assets.  I say this because prior to the time skip he receives immensely physical wounds through his upper body and abdomen, but after the time skip he is wearing an eye patch.  His eye had not been damaged.  Is the eye patch supposed to illustrate how battle weary he has become since before the time skip?  It only brings forth the question of how he lost his eye since it was not injured when we last saw him.  If the aim is to show the character's culmination of his battle exploits that have formed him into the character that we see after the time skip, how about we see him with the scars of the battle that we saw him fought, not the ones we did not see?  Every time we would then see those scars, we would remember the incident that formed them, reminding us of a specific even in the game's story.  Instead, we get an eye patch because eye patches means he is a tough guy.

                Then there is the death of a side character that cannot be avoided no matter what which should come as no surprise to anyone who plays the game.  I say this because the opening movie that plays every time the game is launched clearly shows the character dying.  This is not the only spoiler that occurs within the opening movie.  All one has to do is watch the movie just once for a number of images to keep popping into their heads as they play the game to have a number of plot points lose their impact when they finally occur.  This is not something that is unique to "Nier."  A number of Japanese games that I have played like to do this.  They take all of the game's highest quality cinematics and mash them together to form an opening movie.  This is not something all that bad in upon itself.  One usually wants to put their best foot forward when showcasing the game in an effort to pump up the player and get them excited to see what the game has in store for them.  However, when the game throws together the most pivotal scenes into that mash up and includes plot hints as well, it becomes a ruining experience that devalues the game's story.  

                I said last about mentioning the game's fishing and farming aspects.  Let me just say that there are extensive fishing and farming mechanics.  You can fish in a number of locations that even include quicksand.  You can farm anything from wheat to flowers.  It can even be enough to be a game on itself, especially considering that there are a few difficult goals within those aspects of the game.  I only have one problem with these things.  What in the world do they have to do with the core game?  Absolutely nothing I tell you.  You only have to fish once in the game, and you do not even have to farm to complete the game.  Neither of these things have got anything to do with the core game mechanics.  Reeling in a major catch does nothing to make you hit harder.  Growing a tulip will not make your magic any better.  Or at least I am not aware of such things.  I do not mind a small diversion in some games, even if it is to break the monotony that some can fall into.  But when there is such a large side game that does nothing to correlate itself to the main game, it just feels silly to include it.  I would rather go play a "Harvest Moon" game or "Fishing Resort" at that point.  If the diversion is to the point of being another game itself then it would be better to just go play a game that does that diversion much better.

                I will end just saying that the game world is recycled fluff.  There are only about five or six dungeons that get revisited a number of times, too many times in my opinion.  Sure, when you revisit one or two, you will get an added room or corridor to explore but this is the same problem that "Skyward Sword" suffered from.  Both games have a few giant worlds that take a while to get from one end to another, which highlights their size, but both games end up feeling empty due to a limited number of locations that matter which are visited way too often.

                "Nier" is not a bad game.  It is just generic.  It is another one of the multitude of Japanese games that have got more angsty and brooding characters than substance.  There is even the token city that gets destroyed completely.  The central gameplay is fine, just underdeveloped for the most part.  I looked forward to some of the enemies whose attacks made the battlefield resemble a bullet hell game.  The multiple endings are not all that interesting other than the extra backstory of Kaine.  The only thing that I would say is worth its weight is the game's soundtrack.  The soundtrack alone is worth listening to even without playing the game.  But I cannot go recommending a whole game on just one single aspect.  The game is an alright diversion for a while, but I cannot think of dumping more time into it.

Yours in digital,

BeepBoop

P.S.  Next will be "Four Faultless Felons."

Frontlog 001: "The Body Changer"

Needs a better title card.

Dear Internet,

                Well, this is an unusual type of post, is it not?  I will admit that it is not the usual header that I have for this little experiment of a website.  So far, I have only written with two types of letters, not considering the ones titled "Announcement."  Either I am writing about one of the hundreds of entries that I have accumulated or I am writing about visual novels in general in an attempt to collect my thoughts about how I am approaching my own work.  So, to try and take one of those entries and bring it all the way to the front of the line without even having added it to the pile seems unusual in the very least.  Nay, it is downright rule-breaking if you think about it.  What can I do then, Internet?  There is only one thing I can do, Internet.  I have to make a new category of posts.  The Frontlog will be for games that are removed from the Backlog at an exceptional pace for one reason or another.  The reason that "The Body Changer" is getting the first of these types of posts is due to what I assume is a mass-email.

                About three or four days ago, I got a message from one of the developers of the game, asking for my impressions and what I thought of the game.  I am not sure how the developer knew I even had this game, but I suspect it had something to do with the fact that I got it from the "Be Mine 11" bundle from Groupees.  Maybe Groupees gave the developer contacts for all the purchasers of the bundle so that they could get feedback.  Maybe the only way at the time to get "The Body Changer" was from Desura via the Groupees bundle and by activating the code I was, by default, showing where I got it.  Or maybe mrKaizen of TheShortAndTheTall figured out that I write reviews too much and wanted my opinion.  How in the world that he would know this, I am not sure, especially considering that the email was through a Desura account that was not even remotely associated with this blog.  Chances are that it was just an en mass email, and now mrKaizen stumbled upon asking someone with a little too much time to review a game that is still in its alpha stage.  But, hey, no one else asked me to review their game or some other game either through personal message or by bulk mail.  So, let me get to it.

                "The Body Changer" is a third person shooter that is heavy on puzzle aspects.  It gets pretty down the half way point between the two genres, which is refreshing considering that I am like a knife at a gun fight when it comes to shooters.  The player controls a set of humanoid robots, the "SynB"s, that have to fix a broken facility, specifically reactivate a series of purifiers for the water pumps.  Doing so will allow the facility to be operational again.  Beyond that, the story does not matter much.  The specifics are so scant that it is almost forgettable.  What matters is the gameplay.

 

                The player begins by controlling only one android at first, figuring out how to move properly and aim with the camera.  Eventually the player gains the use of a second android and more after that.  Each of the various androids has specific abilities that allow it to specialize in a certain task. So far, there are three primary types of androids.  There is the combat unit, which can use a selection of lethal weapons.  There is the non-combat colored type that is more used for the game's various puzzles.  And there is the primary one that the player starts off with, which is somewhere in-between the other two.  Once the player has activated another android, they can switch between the two bots seamlessly to be able to tackle the game's puzzles.  

                As, I said before, "The Body Changer" is also a shooter game.  Whenever the player has to control the combat android, there is most likely going to be something that is due for its daily regimen of vitamin lead.  Some of the androids in the facility have gone haywire and begun to roam about, wildly attacking anything they come across, mainly the player.  They are rather simply identified as zombies in the game, something that gives the player a hint as to where to aim with the guns.  In the game's two levels, there are about three types of these malfunctioning robots, maybe four if the lizard men are mechanical.  Some stumble, some run, and some lunge.  No matter what, they need to be killed to advance forward.

Proof that successful enemy naming can give clues to strategy.

                "The Body Changer" has got a few things going for itself despite being only in early alpha.  The puzzles are interesting to say the least.  They were at least able to make me forget the obvious.  A good puzzle game can make the player forget about an earlier rule or solution.  If the game ignores the solution to a previous puzzle for a period of time, the player can end up completely forgetting about that certain situation.  In turn, when the solution repeats itself, the player needs to remember all that he has learned to continue onward.  The game's puzzles are not all just static, allowing an unlimited amount of time to find the solution.  Some of them must be solved while under a time limit or while being attacked by the previously mentioned malfunctioning robots.  The player even has to bounce between two androids during such scenes.

                One thing that I found really intuitive was the control method for crouching.  Most games have one dedicated crouch button that is usually mounted to either the "C" or "Ctrl" key for example.  Games that are made well will allow the player to choose which key they want to crouch.  "The Body Changer" goes one step better.  To crouch, the player can press the "Z," "X," or the "C" key.  Any one of the three buttons can be used.  This means that the player can use any one of his three fingers that are reserved for movement to crouch while still being able to move.  Since crouching is not used long enough to warrant a toggle switch, this is one of the best solutions that I have seen.  Maybe it is not as revolutionary as I want to think, but it makes easy movement while crouching a possibility without having to lose a finger over it.

                Another thing that the game does well is difficulty.  You have the usual bullet sponging from enemies and tighter restrictions on ammo, but changing the difficulty up higher goes one step further.  The waves of enemies that bombard the player change to fit the difficulty.  Instead of facing a lone heavy type of enemy, now you have to dodge his attacks while trying not to dodge into the arms of a zombie.  This simple change means that you have to change your strategies when increasing the difficulty rather than just refining the old ones.

                On the other hand, there are a number of things that "The Body Changer" does that seems like a shot in the foot.  Predominantly is the slow movement of the androids.  While it can be argued that the slow movement is a mechanic to force the player to think out their actions when in combat, it becomes frustrating when just trying to make the android search around for clues to the puzzle.  One or two times, I found myself stuck on a puzzle.  So, I decided to backtrack a little in hopes of a clue.  It was then that I realized how slow the robots moved.  It was just plain frustrating.  The robots can only run forward or in a forward diagonal direction.  That leaves five other of the eight directs to be an abysmally slow walking pace.  Not even the side to side directions get decent movement speeds.  This leads to a limited amount of movement abilities that can be used when fighting enemies.  Forget about trying to run circles around your enemies or even just moving side to side.  Most of the time, you are going to be standing very still and lining up headshots, which would not be so bad if it was not for the barrel roll dodge.

                The game places heavy emphasis on a side roll that allows the player to quickly dodge enemy attacks.  Basically, the player has to crouch and move the mouse in the direction that they want to roll.  While I find it en interesting mechanic, the problem is that once the roll is finished, the player is right back to the frustratingly slow pace that prevents more complicated movements that can take advantage of the space that the player has made away from hostiles.  The roll is mostly used against the lizard men enemies who rush the player.  The player is supposed to roll out of the way and shoot them in a specific way.  This would not be so bad if it were not for the fact that the game gave no hints as to how to fight them other than to tell you how to roll.  The first lizard man is supposed to be shot in the back, but I could not get around him.  Eventually, I think the AI lagged and started to walk away from me.  It was then that I shot him.  The second lizard man is supposed to be fought in a similar manner.  Roll out of the way and shoot him in the face.  The problem here is that doing so for the first five or so times does not indicate that you are doing it correctly.  He does not flinch at your shots.  He does not have any sort of indication that you are doing it correctly.  The only indication that the attack is working is that his health bar makes a minute decrease.  It is so negligible that the first two successful attacks make it seem like you are not doing anything at all.  When this lack of response to the player's actions occurs, the player is likely to attempt another strategy after another, never realizing that what they were doing at first was actually the right way.  Eventually, the lizard man does flinch and even stall, allowing a melee attack to knock him down, but the only way do so is to attempt a strategy over and over, hoping that it will eventually work.

So satisfying.

                There is also the quick turnaround move that is done by double tapping the "S" key.  It is a bit annoying since using the mouse to spin the camera around feels much more natural.  

                On the technical side, the game still has a number of flaws that I hope will be cleared up in the months ahead.  Whenever I took a screenshot, a window would appear that would tell me where the image was saved.  It would make a ticking sound effect when the text was appearing, and then keep making the sound well after the text finished appearing.  As of now, there are no manual save slots, which means that you either play from all over from the beginning or you carry off near where you left off.  A means of manual saving would be nice since both checkpoints and automatic save points feel a bit sporadic in their placing.  Also, if you launch the game under a different difficulty and then load the save file, you will be playing under the new difficulty rather than the previous difficulty.  The melee attack looks really stiffly animated, especially in the joints.  

                Overall, "The Body Changer" is an interesting game that still has got a way to go.  Some things work while others feel plenty clunky.  With only two levels in the alpha build, it is hard to even judge such a game.  I suspect that it will have another eight levels in the end to round it up to ten.  Usually with my reviews, I try and hide a star rating in the bottom with the tags, but I cannot do that this time.  How can I rate a game that is not even done?  All I can do is hope that the words I have here mean something when being read.  Sure, I look forward to playing this game again when it gets a full release, and I may even come back to it for a full review.  Until then, I withhold a final judgement.

Yours in digital,

BeepBoop

Entry 134: "Nier" Pt. 2

Dear Internet,

                "Nier" continues to amaze me with its soundtrack.  The blend of fantastic lyrics and orchestral melody work well to add atmosphere to the post-apocalyptic world and create a unique musical identity for the game.  Everything else that the game has to offer, on the other hand, makes me want to gloss over the game.

                Let me start off with the graphics and aesthetics.  The game "Nier" has an interesting landscape to itself.  Rusting raised-railroad platforms dot the landscape, missing entire segments that have fallen away.  Stone villages carved out of desert rock that house masked people, dominated more by their law system than by the raging sandstorms just outside.  An automated factory houses numerous robots that at a moment's notice will evict or kill any intruding outsider.  So on and so on, the game makes use of its visuals to create a world that is able to convey the story along.  The problem is that the game has a few hiccups so far.  The most obvious one is the excessive use of bloom.  Bloom is a visual mechanic that games and films have started to use in excess in recent years.  It is a lighting effect that is meant to replicate the way that the human body manages light entering the eye.  If a person in real life enters a bright room or goes outside on a bright day after being in a low-lit location, the surrounding area then appears very bright until the eye is able to focus and adjust to the new light situation.  Bloom attempts to replicate this by illuminating the screen every time the camera goes from dark to bright, when the camera is looking at a light source, or when an abundance of light is refracting off a surface.  "Nier" does all three with the final effect being an excessively lit up screen that is irritating to the eyes.  Sometimes the game forces the bloom to activate on a hair trigger, instantly lighting up the surrounding so quickly that I have to stop moving for a few second just so I can let the game auto-focus.  I can understand that the developers wanted to replicate real-world mechanics to make a slightly more realistic image, but when it gets to the point that the player has to actually stop playing for a few seconds this interrupts and flow that the game has built up.

At least I am not on fire, lady.

                On the note of the game's flow, "Nier" moves like a lemon of a car.  It chugs forward intensely for a few feet before giving up and going back to a crawl.  The first segment of the game has the main character collecting various Sealed Verses which act as spells that the player can use.  A small pattern begins to develop of the player getting a Sealed Verse with every boss that is defeated.  Then the game changes shift radically to a text simulator for one "dungeon," if you want to call it that.  The game's pace slows to a crawl while the player has to read a bunch of text that in the end has no point other than to cause the player to slow down.  Worse yet is a labyrinth in text format that can cause the player to have to reload back to a save point because there are no indications as to what the right answer is.  The game just throws out the central game mechanics for a required reading list that does absolutely nothing to add world building or character development.  "Lost Odyssey" had segments of pure text stories interjected into the game, but those were not necessary to read and were implemented to add depth to the characters while making a more fleshed out world.  When "Nier" tries this, the effect is a jerk in a direction that only serves to remind the player that the game has one more hobbled together homage to another game or genre.

                "Nier" has many references to other games and dips its toes into many genres.  One moment, the camera is free control over the character's shoulder, and the next moment, it is locked in a top-down 2D angle.  In one moment, the player is fighting enemies while having free roam movement, and in the next moment, the player has to deal with a bullet-hell styled fighting segment.  One level is designed in a classic "Resident Evil" look, all the way down to the horrible locked cameras that will inevitably lead to cussing players who get sideswiped by an unseen enemy while trying to go around a corner.  There is even a "Legend of Zelda" reference sneaked in if you look quick enough.  This is all well and dandy but it just highlights one of the game's problems.  It is often too busy trying to make a reference or homage to another game that "Nier" itself is unable to make its own identity.  The central gameplay mechanics are constantly being focused through these various lenses of other games that it becomes difficult to say what exactly is supposed to be the norm.  If I want to play a game that pulls from various genres and references, I would rather play "Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door," which does not abandon the core game mechanics set down in the beginning.  One could argue that the over the shoulder, free movement fighting gameplay is the most often gameplay of "Nier," but that would most likely only be the case if the player spends the time to do the various side-quests.

                The sidequests of "Nier" are bland.  They boil down to just a few types of quests.  There is the delivery quest and the collection quest.  Either you are going to go out and find a bunch of normally useless items or carry a package to someone.  This by itself is not all that bad.  Most games boil down to "go here" and "get me this."  The trick is to make it an enjoyable experience by making more than just simple chores.  The first problem is that there are only about five characters that give quests that are named.  Everyone else that hand out jobs is given names like "Villager" or "Merchant."  The game makes no attempt to differentiate between the quest givers.  At first, the game highlights the NPC, via a mini-map and glowing icon over the characters head, when they have a quest to give, but often do not give any indication as to which NPC you must report back to when the job it completed.  This leads to confusion since unless the player memorizes who gave the quest they will have to talk to every person they meet.  On top of that, the quests are rarely given any sort of mask to hide the fact that they are tedious time-wasters that do not even give out worthwhile rewards.  Sure, the player can do them for the cash, but there is nothing that the player needs to buy since health items drop like flies and all the good weapons are practically handed out free while exploring dungeons.  Doing the quests for non-cash rewards usually just end up with rewards that have to be used in other quests.  The never ending spiral continues.  

                It does not help that the game's bosses are just as boring.  Either the player has to bash away with attacks, dodging the attacks that can be seen coming a mile away, or they have to do precision attacking that requires no real thinking to figure out.  One boss is as close to a carbon copy of Gohdan from "The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker" that can be done without leaning to copyright infringement, which ties more into the homage problem than the game's rote gameplay.  Various times, the game tries to add another tutorial, explaining a new move to the player, but when the first strategies end up working the best for so long, why learn the new moves?  A considerable amount of the game can be easily overcome by lining up the enemies in a row and spamming one of the two projectile magic spells.  I was able to beat one dungeon by just standing still and shooting down the corridor.  It was like "Metroid: Other M" all over again.

This is like trying to feel clever when being told there will be cake.

                I have not even touched farming, fishing, the main quest's tediousness, or even the plot problems yet.  But with multiple endings in store, that last part might have to wait a while.   

       

Yours in digital,

BeepBoop