Showing posts with label Mark Twain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mark Twain. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Entry 098: "A Connecticul Yankee in King Arthur's Court" Pt. 2 End



Dear Internet,

                "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" is a wonderfully whimsical book that rarely takes itself seriously.  It does on occasion do so but let me hold off on that for a second.  The novel is one of wit and humor, which should be expected from Mark Twain.  The humor comes from a number of different sources, but the bulk comes from the narrator himself, the Boss.  The Boss is a collection of silly mannerisms and thought processes that rival the simplicity that he sees in the English peasants.  For example, the very first thing that Boss does when he is given power is to make a Patent office.  Making schools and telegraph lines comes afterwards, but he wants to make sure that there is an office that can prove that he thought up the various inventions he makes.

                The Boss is a constant source of humor, usually when he himself does not realize it, which is more a showcase of Twain's ability to make a comical protagonist.  Near the end of the book, Boss must face up against a number of knights in armor riding horses.  He disposes of them one by one using nothing more than a lasso.  The image of a cowboy facing off against men in plate armor wielding lances and swords is enough to cause the work to have a surreal set up.  Just moments later, Boss is popping one left and right using side arms while the populace claim witchcraft.  Later on, the book details the final hurrah that the Boss creates when his technological empire begins to crumble beneath his feet.  We all knew it could not last considering that there are no traces of such an outlandish story being true, even within the confines of the book.  This last stand is one that would otherwise be morbid if it were not for the fact that the narrator is doing most of his plotting off the duff and nonchalantly.  His ego is what makes it so comical.

                However, the book is not entirely a barrel full of monkeys.  There are times that the book knows to pull at the reader's heartstrings.  The most notable one in my mind is one that occurs when King Arthur travels the countryside alongside Boss while in the disguise of a peasant farmer.  In their travels, Arthur sees many things that he would otherwise not.  From slavery that is an indignity against humanity to the actions of lords who act against a human, Arthur sees firsthand the kingdom that he rules.  The amount that he absorbs into his mind is questionable and can be argued to not have made much of an effect on him.  I digress, for the segment that I want to mention is the one that lies in the chapter called "The Smallpox Hut."  Within this chapter, a woman is found to be diseased by smallpox, and her family is touched by the malice as well.  She recounts her situation which has led to her abandonment by the other villagers and the clergy.  It is filled with hardship and misfortune.  The single chapter can stand on its own ability, and I recommend it to you to read it.

                Even the book's final ending of the Boss knows how to make a tragedy out of a comedy.  I have said that the narrator is a fool and is made fun of by his actions.  The book does not take him seriously nor should we.  He is a smart dumb man, if that is possible.  The fact that his downfall stems from the superstitious tendencies of the populace or at least the unwilling nature to learn the truth of science highlights the fact that he himself is unwilling to learn and remember the nature of those people.  If he was as willing to learn about the people around his as he wished for them to learn, he probably would have foreseen and prevented the eventual downfall.  But the end of the book remembers to not paint him as a one sided coin.  Even in his last moments upon his deathbed, the Boss's positive qualities are highlighted just enough to make the reader remember that even he had some good qualities about him.  In fact, nearly every character is given this treatment of well-roundedness.  King Arthur is a simpleton that does not know where vegetables come from, but he knows warfare and how to rule.  Morgan le Fey is a tyrant that knows no mercy, but she keeps a clean house.  Sandy has a way with words that never seems to end, but she has some qualities that even the narrator found admirable.  "Yankee" does not paint a picture with flat colors.  Instead it uses shades to remind the reader of the many facets of people.

                "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" is an enjoyable book to say the least.  It made me laugh and cry, albeit quietly lest I come across as being weirder than I already am.  It is a book that remembers to not take itself too seriously while at the same time takes its topic as serious.  It is a rightful paradox through and through.  It entertains and provokes thought, which is essential to a book.

Yours in digital,
BeepBoop

P.S Next is "K-On!" and "K-On!!"  Why in the world is this in my Backlog?

Monday, July 29, 2013

Entry 097: "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" Pt. 1



Dear Internet,

                It is somewhat comical about the juxtaposition of the random cards I pick.  Ignoring the middle man of "Genocyber," which is rather recommendable even outside the context of this entry, I pulled "Stranger in a Strange Land" and then "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" by Mark Twain.  The two books do very similar things but take two completely different roads about it and end in completely different paths, or at least I think they will since I only got half way through "Yankee" today.  But I am getting ahead of myself again.

                "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" follows the self narrative tale of a man that claims to have traveled to the days of knights and tables round.  Twain starts off with the story being not from his own hand but a manuscript from another person.  The man who narrates the tale is a factory engineer and foreman who, after receiving a blow to the head from one of his workers, was thrown back some 1300 years into the past.  There, he is captured rather passively by Sir Kay and is brought to the court of Camelot.  Sir Kay tells an elaborate story of how he had to fight off numerous wizards for hours on end and that the narrator was the last one whom Sir Kay decided to spare.  That is to say he lies.  The narrator is marked as a spell weaver and thrown into the dungeon to be burned at the stake.  He thankfully remembers one tiny bit of information concerning a total eclipse that just so happens right when he is going to be burned.  He uses this information to make the populace fear him as a powerful wizard just when the sun becomes obstructed by the moon the next day.  Afterwards, he receives a place of power next to King Arthur and is thence referred to by the title "The Boss."

                The novel is filled with satire and humor, which is expected of Mark Twain.  The characters that populate the story are some of the simplest minded individuals that you will meet.  They are like children with their level of reasoning.  They lie to one another with reckless abandon and believe another's lie just as quickly.  The tall tales that the knights brag to one another make the knights boarder somewhere between habitual liars and pathological liars.  The fact that the narrator almost was burned at the stake for one of these bragging lies shows how dangerous these lies can be.  However, the narrator comes to sympathize with them for having being ignorant rather than being stupid.  He thinks that with a little education, the lot could be made civilized to the point of the then modern America.  The joke here is that The Boss is neither more civilized than those that are around him, only more knowledgeable in the field of science.  It is even more comical when The Boss sympathizes with Morgan le Fay's choice to hang a group of poorly playing musicians.

                The book, and by proxy the narrator, knows how to make a theatrical scene.  Numerous times already, The Boss has had to go toe to toe against the book's Merlin.  The Merlin in "Yankee" is one far removed from the traditional one that we hear in our bedtime stories.  He is simply made as a charlatan witch doctor with all the trappings of a superstitious old coot.  His magic can do nothing other than make a few puff of smoke and chant some nonsense words that he believes will fix the world's problems.  The narrator is pretty much the same with the exception that what he does for the audience that views his works he does not believe to be magic because he knows it is not.  The narrator will create billowing plumes of smoke of various colors that are followed by rockets and water pumps made to illicit the fears and imaginations of the populace.  His first display of "magic" was a solar eclipse, so it is easy to see why the people are ready to believe him.  Whether or not this stems from their ignorance or because of their gullibility does not change the fact that The Boss is constantly pulling the wool over people's eyes.

                But what does all this have to do with "Stranger in a Strange Land" you ask?  It boils down to the fact that they both are a story with some outsider entering into a society with the intent of improving the society the meet.  "Stranger" had Smith, the superman with psychic powers and a penchant for half bakes philosophies that require a new breed of man to partially work.  "Yankee" has The Boss, a scientific conman that has yet to fall for his own con.  The second half of the book might prove me wrong, but the natures of the books could not be father apart.  "Stranger" plays the story straight with all seriousness under the mask of being lighthearted so that it can capture the reader unprepared.  "Yankee" is a silly science fiction tale (remember that it is a time travel story so far) that does everything tongue in cheek with a serious narrator who thinks of himself as important.  Both books want to poke holes in society through the use of a proxy society, by really talking about the society that the author is coming from.  Both books even try to tackle the topic of religion.  "Yankee" does a far better job than "Stranger" in this aspect for the standalone fact that is actually marks the Catholic Church as its target.  "Stranger" does things half heartedly with its fingers crossed behind its back when it says it is not attacking any one religion in particular when it clearly does so if one reads between the lines.  Both works have a main character that believes he is going to improve the people of those around him through the use of science.  "Yankee" admits to the futility of such an endeavor.  "Stranger" actually thinks this is possible.  This is the difference between satire and serious intent that I mentioned in my first post of "Stranger."  The difference is laughter, a laughter that "Stranger" wants to make the reader feel guilty to laugh with.  "Yankee knows that it is not only healthy to laugh but that it is right to laugh.

                And I suspect that I will laugh for some time tomorrow.

Yours in digital,
BeepBoop