Thursday, March 21, 2013

Entry 014: "Pet Shop of Horrors"




Dear Internet,

                Today I pulled the card for "Pet Shop of Horrors."  It is a short four episode television series based on the manga of the same name.  The narrative revolves around Detective Leon Orcot and his attempts to uncover the mysteries revolving around Count D, the owner of a Chinatown store that specializes in obscure animals which are all claw length in the supernatural.  In each of the four episodes, the story follows the same jest.  Someone comes into the pet shop, gets a strange creature to take home with some condition attached to it, and then breaks the conditions and it all goes wrong.  Three of the four episodes follow this to the letter.  Only the forth one makes a divergence.  The problem with making a formula is that the predictability of the show goes straight through the roof.  For example, the television series "The A-Team" almost always had the good guys captured at the 42nd minute (when aired with commercials) mark.  After watching a marathon of the show you could set your watch to it.  Everyone who watched this knew it, but what made people watch it was the cast of characters and enjoyable plot.  The same thing must be addressed in "Pet Shop of Horrors."

                The regular cast of the show number a strong two or a weak four depending on whether you want to count the police chief and Leon's female co-worker.  Leon is a poor detective to say the least, but the show tries not to make him seem so.  The first act of his foolishness is to walk up to Count D in his shop, claim that the shop is a den for drug dealers and human trafficking, and expect Count D to admit to it.  What kind of cop would think direct confrontation would work?  I doubt any criminal short of a stool pigeon or fink would cave so easily when approached such.  Even guilty children when asked if they stole a cookie avoid the question, trying to pin the blame elsewhere.  Leon is not the brightest police officer and I would be OK with that had the shown played him as such, but it does not. 

                Some of the other characters deny common sense when confronted by the supernatural "pets" that Count D offers.  The first three episodes all have a customer come into the shop having recently lost a person near to them and walk out with a "pet" that looks nearly exactly like their recently lost person, albeit with a tail or two.  The first problem with this that a viewer would see is that these people are attempting to fill a hole in their life with a substitute.  The parents in "Daughter" try to replace their deceased child who they spoiled to death, literally.  The man in "Delicious" tries to absolve himself of the guilt of his wife's suicide.  The actor in "Despair" wishes to fill the void of being divorced.  All of these people are running away from their actions or problems and seeking an easy escape.  With this understood, it only makes the character of Count D to be tenfold despicable.  He, as anyone else can, tell that his special customers are desperate people and are eventually going to break the conditions of the contract that he makes with them.  He knows their weaknesses and exploits them.  The show attempts to absolve him because it is the weaknesses of the customers that do them in.  But that would be like saying giving an alcoholic a bottle of whisky is alright since it is the drunk that drinks.  

                "Pet Shop of Horrors" does have a few things that work for it once you get past the formula, which thankfully occurs in episode four.  The horror elements are all there including a visually unnerving image of demonic rabbits and the psychological concept that is paired next to it.  The show even goes as far to question whether or not Count D actually sells supernatural pets at all in a few episodes by only having him and the customer ever seeing the creature in question before the contract breaks.  Another time it is purposed that the customer hallucinated the creature before they died and Count D was lying to Leon.  There are a number of overlaying themes and motifs that weave themselves together for each episode.  Although, some of the concepts that an episode leaves the audience with are rather troubling to say the least.  Episode three ends with Count D praising the decision of his customer to kill himself and be known for a single spectacular role in a movie than "getting old and wasting his life in the ugly world of show business."  

                Overall "Pet Shop of Horrors" is a an average show that might have been better provided it had more episodes to continue.  The source material had ten volumes to draw from, but there were only four episodes made for television.  Nearly every male character is a pretty-boy with disproportional  legs, but that's because its source material is a "shojo" demographic aimed at young girls.  The biggest pull of the show is also its biggest flaw.  The themes of loss are universal, but the way that the characters respond to it and are then often made to seem sympathetic despite their bad decisions.  The old saying "you've made your bed, now lie in it," comes to mind.  The characters here instead go to a roach motel.  Except for episode four.  That guy gets a nice little white house.

Yours in digital,
BeepBoop

No comments:

Post a Comment